Comparisons Block
Comparison Table
A side-by-side comparison block for alternatives, vendors, products, or options.
comparison-table1 slidedense density
Comparison
Three options, four criteria
Keep criteria parallel so the conclusion is defensible.
FitCostRisk
HighMedMed
FitHighMed
FitMedHigh
OPF Config
blocks:comparison-tableOpen Presentation Format
{
"$schema": "https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf/v1",
"name": "Comparison Table",
"description": "A side-by-side comparison block for alternatives, vendors, products, or options.",
"tone": "formal",
"narrative": "pyramid-principle",
"takeaway": "Compare options across shared decision criteria.",
"tags": [
"content-block",
"gallery:blocks/comparison-table"
],
"design": {
"colorScheme": "slate-gray",
"fontScheme": "segoe-ui",
"background": {
"type": "solid",
"color": "#ffffff"
}
},
"slides": [
{
"id": "comparison-table",
"layout": "table-1x",
"title": "Three options, four criteria",
"subtitle": "Structured comparison for decision-making.",
"table": {
"columns": [
"Criteria",
"Option A",
"Option B",
"Option C"
],
"rows": [
[
"Fit",
"Medium",
"High",
"Low"
],
[
"Cost",
"$$",
"$$$",
"$"
],
[
"Risk",
"Low",
"Medium",
"High"
]
]
}
}
]
}Open in visual editorOpen in Inspector
Load this config in the gallery's visual editor, or in the Inspector at pptx.dev.
Use Case
Use when a decision depends on structured comparison across consistent criteria.
When to Use
For vendor selection, feature comparison, option analysis, and competitive positioning.
When to Avoid
Avoid when the criteria are not comparable across options.
Block Structure
comparison
Three options, four criteria
Structured comparison for decision-making.
Best Practices
1
Keep criteria mutually exclusive.
2
Use consistent rating language.
3
Make the recommendation explicit outside the table.
Playground deep link: config=blocks:comparison-table