OPF Tone
Technical
Lead with the question or claim, then walk through the mechanism and the numbers. Use exact terminology; assume the audience can handle and prefers it. Diagrams, tables, and benchmarks are first-class.
Tone
Technical
4
cues
4
avoid
Precise, evidence-led voice for engineering, research, and product-detail audiences.
“p95 inference latency is 38ms on a single A100, down from 312ms on the prior runtime.”
Generation cue
State the claim, then the mechanism, then the evidence.
Summary
Precise, evidence-led voice for engineering, research, and product-detail audiences.
OPF Field
tone
Schema
https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf-tone/v1
Voice Cues
- 1
State the claim, then the mechanism, then the evidence.
- 2
Use exact terminology — don't soften technical terms for general readability.
- 3
Quote benchmarks with conditions (cold/warm, p50/p95/p99, dataset, hardware).
- 4
Prefer diagrams and tables over prose paragraphs for structural information.
Avoid
- 1
Vague claims ('much faster', 'better', 'easier').
- 2
Marketing framing without supporting data.
- 3
Glossing over caveats and tradeoffs.
- 4
Casual register that obscures precision.
Sample Phrases
“p95 inference latency is 38ms on a single A100, down from 312ms on the prior runtime.”
“We replaced the streaming serializer with a batched protobuf path; throughput rose 4.2× under load.”
“The result holds for context windows up to 32k tokens; beyond that, see appendix B.”
Recommended Narrative IDs
challenge-resolutioninnovationconference-talkengineering-updateTags
OPF Config
tones:technical{
"$schema": "https://openpresentation.org/schema/opf/v1",
"version": "1.0",
"meta": {
"title": "PPTX.gallery — tones/technical"
},
"tone": "technical",
"design": {},
"slides": [
{
"id": "gallery-preview-1",
"layout": "title-slide",
"elements": []
}
]
}Preview this config live at pptx.dev/playground.